Apologies for forum Moderator being absent for months
The MSZ Forum moderator (which is me), has been unwell for months. I am slowly getting better and will attempt to reply to all messages as soon as possible. Full message posted here: www.moviestudiozen.com/forum/announcements/3653-explanation-for-moderator-absence-on-the-movie-studio-zen-forum
Computer advice when sticking with 1920x1080 50p
- Eagle eye.
-
Offline Topic Author - Zen Level 4
-
- Posts: 137
- Thank you received: 35
Computer advice when sticking with 1920x1080 50p was created by Eagle eye.
Posted 19 Aug 2015 13:02 #2225Recently I took some 1920x1080 50p footage in several clips. I customised AVC/AAC Internet 1080p template to be 50fps renamed it and saved.
The video took my setup 10min 37sec to render 3mins of footage. The MSP edited video image on my 65” 4K TV via my WD Passport HDD was the best I have seen from my HXR-NX70P camera. I am happy to continue with this quality format and not bother with the extra expense of 4K. However I would like to lower render times and of course one day burn this MP4 to Blu-ray. Can you suggest any changes to my setup that you see would help achieve that outcome. I have included a frame grab and the video properties in the attachments below.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Replied by MSZ-Derek on topic Computer advice when sticking with 1920x1080 50p
Posted 19 Aug 2015 13:48 #2226I am into week 2 of being on Windows 10 after doing a clean install of the new operating system.
So I have been doing a lot of test renders with all the different formats.
What I can see quite clearly is that Mainconcept AVC/AAC with the Encode Mode set to CPU only is very slow, even with my i7-2600k over-clocked to 4.3 GHz.
From what I have learnt on the Creative Cow Sony Vegas Forum, Sony uses the default Mainconcept Encoder which is quite old now and has not been updated by the owners of this codec. Which means it is not taking advantage of the newest hardware architectures. So there is no way to speed this up on your system.
If you had an older Nvidia GTX500 or GTX400 Series Graphics Card (like I do), you could set the Encoder to CUDA and see very fast rendering times. Unfortunately Nvidia GTX600 Series and above use a different architecture which no longer works with the out of date Mainconcept Encoder.
You could also experiment with Sony AVC/MVC and see if your computer supports Intel Quick Sync. Your CPU has Intel Integrated HD Graphics, but it depends on what type of Motherboard Chipset you have, as to whether Quicksync will work. Open the Encode list and you will see it listed. Many people report that Intel Quicksync is faster at rendering than the CPU or Graphics Card.
If you have Movie Studio Platinum 13 or Sony Vegas Pro 13, you could experiment with the XAVC format, which supports 25p, 50p and 4K video.
This is a high quality / high bit rate codec and it renders faster than Mainconcept AVC/AAC on my computer.
Regards
Derek.
Unplugging is the best way to find solutions to your problems. If you would like to share some love, post a customer testimonial or make a donation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Eagle eye.
-
Offline Topic Author - Zen Level 4
-
- Posts: 137
- Thank you received: 35
Replied by Eagle eye. on topic Computer advice when sticking with 1920x1080 50p
Posted 19 Aug 2015 15:14 #2227
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Replied by MSZ-Derek on topic Computer advice when sticking with 1920x1080 50p
Posted 19 Aug 2015 16:43 #2228Read about it here:
www.redsharknews.com/technology/item/2080-ten-reasons-to-like-sony-s-pro-video-format,-xavc?page=1
The jerky movement may mean that the Data Rate coming from the WD Passport Drive to your display device (TV ?) is not sufficient enough for real time playback, with the larger XAVC-S files.
If the WD Passport Drive is only connected via USB 2.0, that could explain it. The drive itself is probably only spinning at 5400 rpm, instead of the faster 7200 rpm which is another factor.
USB 3.0 (blue connector ends) can transfer much faster and keep up with streaming of large files.
USB 2.0 is very old tech now and most new computers and devices now only use USB 3.0
Unplugging is the best way to find solutions to your problems. If you would like to share some love, post a customer testimonial or make a donation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Eagle eye.
-
Offline Topic Author - Zen Level 4
-
- Posts: 137
- Thank you received: 35
Replied by Eagle eye. on topic Computer advice when sticking with 1920x1080 50p
Posted 20 Aug 2015 06:43 #2230Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Replied by MSZ-Derek on topic Computer advice when sticking with 1920x1080 50p
Posted 20 Aug 2015 16:01 #2231Your Sony 4K TV should be able to play XAVC S video.
I know there are a few people on the Sony Creative Software Vegas Pro Forum, who say Sony XAVC S workes beautifully on their 4K TVs.
My flat screen TV is way too old to test anything on, so I am in the dark and can't perform any real world tests.
Do an experiment and render your 50p project to XAVC S 25p instead.
You can't encode Blu-ray discs with XAVC S. Only Sony MVC and MPEG2 are supported.
My suggestion is that you post your problem on the Sony Creative Software Vegas Pro or Vegas Movie Studio Forum, and see if the brains trust can think of something else.
Unplugging is the best way to find solutions to your problems. If you would like to share some love, post a customer testimonial or make a donation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Eagle eye.
-
Offline Topic Author - Zen Level 4
-
- Posts: 137
- Thank you received: 35
Replied by Eagle eye. on topic Computer advice when sticking with 1920x1080 50p
Posted 20 Aug 2015 17:10 #2232Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Replied by kiwihans on topic Computer advice when sticking with 1920x1080 50p
Posted 17 Feb 2016 19:21 #3306NTFS, FAT 32 and exfat. FAT 32 is quite an old format and the drawback with FAT 32 is that it will only accommodate 4GB files. That's why Microsoft came up with the exfat format a few years ago, which does not have this limit.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Replied by MSZ-Derek on topic Computer advice when sticking with 1920x1080 50p
Posted 18 Feb 2016 15:21 #3311Solution = bought inexpensive external Media Player box from eBay.
This device does accept NTFS USB drives and has it's own remote you can use to Play/FF.
I just bought a Samsung 4K TV and can now access all my videos stored on PC via Wi-Fi home network.
Wi-Fi Modem/Router is central device that controls all the traffic.
TV connects to Router via Wi-Fi, which then connects to PC.
It took a while to get everything set up correctly before it would work. The most import part was to go into Network & Sharing settings for Windows and turn ON Media Streaming. Now my days of moving files onto USB drives are over.
Unplugging is the best way to find solutions to your problems. If you would like to share some love, post a customer testimonial or make a donation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Replied by kiwihans on topic Computer advice when sticking with 1920x1080 50p
Posted 18 Feb 2016 17:36 #3312I am getting a lot of movie work (8mm and some 16mm) to do at the moment. It seems that in our area there are only two movie operators now doing this type of work. I am one of them. My latest job to do is to capture a 16mm movie (plays at 18fps) on my 16mm telecine machine. The telecine machine only plays at 24fps. Thank goodness for Sony Vegas where you can adjust the lenght of the clip to suit the frame rate! Gets more complicated - the movie has a magnetic sound track - the telecine will only handle optical sound. I will have to play the movie on another projector which has magnetic sound, and marry the tow up.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Forum Access
- Not Allowed: to create new topic.
- Not Allowed: to reply.
- Not Allowed: to edit your message.

